tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4365107680230012909.post8838663555139226035..comments2023-10-26T09:15:47.455-04:00Comments on Army of Epiphenomenon: McCain Selects Running MateAoEhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/06696803811723252837noreply@blogger.comBlogger5125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4365107680230012909.post-87135751800072905082008-06-21T22:31:00.000-04:002008-06-21T22:31:00.000-04:00HAHAHA. Yes. I would totally contribute to this ca...HAHAHA. Yes. I would totally contribute to this campaign!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4365107680230012909.post-8186825004423075222008-06-11T22:12:00.000-04:002008-06-11T22:12:00.000-04:00This was a huge mistake. Although, "blondes have m...This was a huge mistake. Although, "blondes have more fun," Miley Cyrus was clearly the best choice. I think I'm going to vote for Bob Barr now... or there's always Ralph Nader.John L.https://www.blogger.com/profile/03639895830281210215noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4365107680230012909.post-27415245995679585362008-06-11T02:43:00.000-04:002008-06-11T02:43:00.000-04:00i liked jaireds rant but I like McCains choice for...i liked jaireds rant but I like McCains choice for VP much better. Hilary is smokin'. Good work McCain you can count on my vote!Anonymoushttps://www.blogger.com/profile/13456492711382701393noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4365107680230012909.post-28167471591325486982008-06-10T23:23:00.000-04:002008-06-10T23:23:00.000-04:00I LOVE McC-DYou are the slogan-master.I LOVE McC-D<BR/><BR/>You are the slogan-master.Stephanie Mhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/03799476872543667646noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4365107680230012909.post-89246612779114645762008-06-10T17:02:00.000-04:002008-06-10T17:02:00.000-04:00not to mention that if the Supreme Court had to in...not to mention that if the Supreme Court had to interpret the meaning of the term "thirty-five years of age" as it relates to a president's qualifications, it would probably say something to the effect of: "The age restriction, doubtless relevant at the time of the constitution's ratification, due to the benefits of the modern development of compulsory public education, is now merely a matter of historical archaicness, and as we know, a tablespoon of history is worth a pint of logic, and logic dictates that where the constitution is irrelevant, it merely be interpreted to conform to the clearly enlightened and superior sensitivies of our contemporary era; which is to say, where the constitution says 'thirty-five' with regard to the qualifications of the president, it really means anybody over 'five' with a mental capacity that could think up a rational basis to determine all substantially compelling government interests that would be required by a president of the united states [commenter's commentary/ which isn't much, given the recent years of Bush /end commenter's commentary]."Jaired B. Hallhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05083190368030439706noreply@blogger.com